Injustice vs. Justice

By Jaxson

Main Difference

The main difference between Injustice and Justice is that the Injustice is a quality relating to unfairness or undeserved outcomes and Justice is a concept of moral fairness and administration of the law.

  • Injustice

    Injustice is a quality relating to unfairness or undeserved outcomes. The term may be applied in reference to a particular event or situation, or to a larger status quo. In Western philosophy and jurisprudence, injustice is very commonly -but not always- defined as either the absence or the opposite of justice.

    The sense of injustice is a universal human feature, though the exact circumstances considered unjust can vary from culture to culture. While even acts of nature can sometimes arouse the sense of injustice, the sense is usually felt in relation to human action such as misuse, abuse, neglect, or malfeasance that is uncorrected or else sanctioned by a legal system or fellow human beings.

    The sense of injustice can be a powerful motivational condition, causing people to take action not just to defend themselves but also others who they perceive to be unfairly treated.

  • Justice

    Justice is the legal or philosophical theory by which fairness is administered. The concept of justice differs in every culture. An early theory of justice was set out by the Ancient Greek philosopher Plato in his work The Republic. Advocates of divine command theory argue that justice issues from God. In the 17th century, theorists like John Locke argued for the theory of natural law. Thinkers in the social contract tradition argued that justice is derived from the mutual agreement of everyone concerned. In the 19th century, utilitarian thinkers including John Stuart Mill argued that justice is what has the best consequences. Theories of distributive justice concern what is distributed, between whom they are to be distributed, and what is the proper distribution. Egalitarians argued that justice can only exist within the coordinates of equality. John Rawls used a social contract argument to show that justice, and especially distributive justice, is a form of fairness. Property rights theorists (like Robert Nozick) take a deontological view of distributive justice and argue that property rights-based justice maximizes the overall wealth of an economic system. Theories of retributive justice are concerned with punishment for wrongdoing. Restorative justice (also sometimes called “reparative justice”) is an approach to justice that focuses on restoring what is good, and necessarily focuses on the needs of victims and offenders.

  • Injustice (noun)

    Absence of justice; unjustice.

  • Injustice (noun)

    Violation of the rights of another person.

  • Injustice (noun)

    Unfairness; the state of not being fair or just.

  • Justice (noun)

    The state or characteristic of being just or fair.

    “the justice of a description”

  • Justice (noun)

    The ideal of fairness, impartiality, etc., especially with regard to the punishment of wrongdoing.

    “Justice was served.”

  • Justice (noun)

    Judgment and punishment of a party who has allegedly wronged another.

    “to demand justice”

  • Justice (noun)

    The civil power dealing with law.

    “Ministry of Justice”

    “the justice system”

  • Justice (noun)

    A title given to judges of certain courts; capitalized as a title.

    “Mr. Justice Krever presides over the appellate court”

  • Justice (noun)

    Correctness, conforming to reality or rules.


Leave a Comment